Replicats
  • Website
  • X
  • Telegram
  • Discord
  • Blog
  • Foundation
    • Overview
      • The Current State of Crypto Trading
      • Why Agents Matter
      • The Replicats Approach
    • Platform Architecture
      • Agent Framework
      • Wallet System
      • Trading Engine
    • Business Model
    • Roadmap & Sprints
      • Sprints #1
      • Sprint #2
      • Sprint #3 [Current]
    • Team
    • First Agent: Replicat-One
      • About
      • Tokenomics
      • Contract Addresses
    • FAQ
    • We're hiring!
      • Data Engineer – Blockchain Data Specialist (Hired)
      • Blockchain Trading Engineer
  • Technical Foundations
    • Beyond LLMs
      • The Limits of Pure Language Models
      • Why Representation Learning Matters
      • Replicats' Hybrid Approach
    • Data Infrastructure
  • Creating Agents
    • Agent Building
    • Agent Management
  • Official Links
    • Important notice
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • The Power of Learned Representations
  • Mathematical Foundations
  • Temporal Dynamics
  • The Information Bottleneck

Was this helpful?

  1. Technical Foundations
  2. Beyond LLMs

Why Representation Learning Matters

The mathematical and practical advantages of representation learning in financial markets.

The Power of Learned Representations

Representation learning addresses a fundamental challenge in market analysis: how to transform raw market data into meaningful, actionable features. Unlike predetermined features or LLM embeddings, learned representations capture the inherent structure of market data:

ϕ:X→H\phi: \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{H}ϕ:X→H

Where X\mathcal{X}X is the space of raw market data and H\mathcal{H}H is a learned representation space that captures meaningful market dynamics.

Mathematical Foundations

The power of representation learning comes from its ability to capture complex market structures. Consider a market with multiple assets and various types of relationships. We can model this as a heterogeneous graph:

G=(V,E,A,R)\mathcal{G} = (\mathcal{V}, \mathcal{E}, \mathcal{A}, \mathcal{R})G=(V,E,A,R)

Where:

  • V\mathcal{V}V represents vertices (assets, traders, protocols)

  • E\mathcal{E}E represents edges (relationships)

  • A\mathcal{A}A represents vertex attributes

  • R\mathcal{R}R represents relationship types

Through representation learning, we can learn embeddings that preserve the essential structure of this market graph:

hv=fϕ(v,N(v))where N(v)= neighborhood of vertex vh_v = f_\phi(v, \mathcal{N}(v)) \\ \text{where }\mathcal{N}(v) = \text{ neighborhood of vertex }vhv​=fϕ​(v,N(v))where N(v)= neighborhood of vertex v

Temporal Dynamics

Market behavior is inherently temporal. Representation learning allows us to capture these dynamics through specialized architectures:

ht=fϕ(xt,ht−1)where ht captures market state at time th_t = f_\phi(x_t, h_{t-1}) \\ \text{where }h_t\text{ captures market state at time }tht​=fϕ​(xt​,ht−1​)where ht​ captures market state at time t

This allows for:

  1. Multi-scale temporal patterns

  2. Regime detection

  3. Trend analysis

  4. Volatility modeling

The Information Bottleneck

Representation learning operates on the principle of the information bottleneck:

min⁡p(h∣x)I(X;H)−βI(H;Y)\min_{p(h|x)} I(X; H) - \beta I(H; Y)p(h∣x)min​I(X;H)−βI(H;Y)

Where:

  • I(X;H)I(X;H)I(X;H) is the mutual information between input and representation

  • I(H;Y)I(H;Y)I(H;Y) is the mutual information between representation and target

  • βββ controls the trade-off between compression and prediction

This framework ensures that learned representations:

  • Capture relevant market information

  • Discard noise

  • Maintain predictive power

  • Generalize well to new conditions

PreviousThe Limits of Pure Language ModelsNextReplicats' Hybrid Approach

Last updated 3 months ago

Was this helpful?